So the Haas boys have qualified Grosjean 15th, Gutierrez 16th.
The Formula 1 qualifying format breaks the drivers down into three groups, based on their qualifying elimination. Grosjean and Gutierrez are at the bottom of the second group… not bad. They are ahead of Manor, Sauber and Renault. Not bad considering one of the teams is Renault… and that the other team is also a Ferrari customer.
Clearly the trouble lies ahead, with those Mercedes powered cars towards the front of the grid. So what should my perspective be? I want to hear the American Anthem played in Russia!!! Let’s get that out of the way.
But… just bring the cars home is what we want. The last race did not even come close to previous expectations; Esteban’s 14th and Romains 19th in the Chinese Grand Prix. But those results are on par with their qualifying for Sochi. 15/16
Grosjean still lagged a bit there in China finishing 19th. The discussion breaks down to tire grip. When I see the car I see oversteer, the suspension seems to not be taking the energy. But as @Mattpt55 put it in a tweet, the problem seems “to be baked” into the tire, which is the best way to describe it. Every part of the car suspension has to do a job to take a turn. It is simple physics, but not so simple. As that car is trying to get around a turn, the idea is to take the energy from the inside front wheel and to transfer it to the opposite rear. Everything along that visual path you created in your head comes into play, including the chassis.
Today during the NBC Broadcast Steve Machette said something very peculiar that no one seemed to pick up on. During the broadcast he blamed the possible slip on, Paraphrase: a fatigued chassis . I find this surprising. Composite structures do not degrade in a way which energy transfer would be effected. These chassis are built in autoclaves under vacuum and heat. Boeing is using these same technologies to build the 787 and 777. After 4 races, could a chassis cause suspension issues or even change in it’s integrity? Or… is Steve Machette manufacturing a cause? I think he is doing a very careful tip toe through the Pirelli tulips! Careful there Steve, don’t tread upon ones bulbs! I think it’s the tires…
Regarding the Chassis…
Haas did everything the could to eliminate manufacturing flaws from the equation. Any aspect of the chassis which could be attributed to the manufacturing process, went to Dallara. Seemingly conflicting information, which was actually evolving information, did come out of the Haas camp. Initially the claim was that Dallara will only be exercising their manufacturing expertise. Haas will deliver all engineering to Dallara. But over time, relationships build. Some smart guy at Dallara gains the respect of a Haas engineer and says, ya know… we’ve seen this or that… or have done it this way here and there, and now the design is evolving. It is almost impossible to imagine a situation where that does not happen. When people go to work every day they put their best into it. And if a guy is going to work to build an F1 car chassis that day, he’s amped! I’ve noted a softening between the lines with Dallara, which is how every good business relationship evolves.
In an earlier post I questioned whether either of these cars were the prototypes? I’m not entirely ruling out what Steve said, but I believe it is more down to vehicle dynamics. This is where a single tire supplier is bad. It creates a blind baseline of sorts. The current minimums are 23 psi (fronts) 19.5 psi (rears). As long as there is only one tire manufacturer, every team is the same, so Pirelli opt on the high side to best protect their marketing interest, tire exploding and maring their good name. But another tire manufacturer will push both , because they want the marketing sweetness that only winning brings. Currently Pirelli wins every race. they just lower the bar for “everyone’s own good, safety!” uh huh… I digress…
This we do know… The Haas car is fast. The results in Australia and Bahrain have demonstrated a high degree of potential. Imagine the Haas teams expectations this week had they never tasted points? A 5th and 6th place finish does not happen by accident. I started this piece with the long-range perspective and here I am… Talking about 5th and 6th place finishes.
But there is yet another aspect to this race. We have Guiterrez and Grosjean lining up next to each other. With Guiterrez finishing ahead of his French teammate in china, he might have a bit of a swagger to him.
<a data-pin-do=”embedPin” href=”https://www.pinterest.com/pin/389420699011352890/”></a>
Turn 1 is a dog leg right, after which you need a #1 driver to hit the green on 2. This track is exactly opposite to China. I think I don’t like that track at all. Anyway, it’s a short run to turn 1, so launch is everything. A slow start means they’ve gotta carry the extra speed into one… it could bottleneck, and whoever has the most speed out of turn 1 will get the better line into 2, and leading. It is a good track.
Results… my gut tells me that we see points. All things being equal, I think the senior driver brings home the bacon. But I’m not willing to underestimate Gutierrez. He has improved every race, well sorta. But his attitude has been right on. and he has taken exception to the correct things. Perhaps some of that Ferrari discipline is paying off for Haas. there’s many ways to measure winning and so far Gutierrez is exceeding those expectations.
12th and 8th…
I’m not proof reading this, so please forgive me. sorry for rambling.
And to the HAAS Team… It’s May Day In Russia! Fly those American Flags Loud and Proud!!! Let our Russian hosts see our colors! Your fans are behind you 1000%
Party on Garth!
<script async defer src=”//assets.pinterest.com/js/pinit.js”>